Where It Breaks
-
No clear incident ownership
-
Alerts without prioritization
-
Detection exists but response is inconsistent
-
Overloaded security teams
-
No structured post-incident improvement
What We Actually Do
01
Incident Readiness Assessment
[Assessment]
-
Review of detection, escalation paths, and response structure
02
Incident Response Design
[Project]
-
Define response workflows, ownership, and playbooks
03
Lean Security Operations Setup
[Project]
-
Design detection logic, prioritization models, and operational workflows
04
Fractional Security Operations Leadership
[Retainer]
-
Ongoing oversight, strategy, and operational alignment without building oversized teams
What We Actually Do
01
Incident Readiness Assessment
[Assessment]
-
Review of detection, escalation paths, and response structure
02
Incident Response Design
[Project]
-
Define response workflows, ownership, and playbooks
03
Lean Security Operations Setup
[Project]
-
Design detection logic, prioritization models, and operational workflows
04
Fractional Security Operations Leadership
[Retainer]
-
Ongoing oversight, strategy, and operational alignment without building oversized teams
What You Get
Clear ownership and playbooks for real incidents, a lean operating model, and detection that prioritizes business risk over alert volume
What We Actually Do
01
Incident Readiness Assessment
[Assessment]
-
Review of detection, escalation paths, and response structure
02
Incident Response Design
[Project]
-
Define response workflows, ownership, and playbooks
03
Lean Security Operations Setup
[Project]
-
Design detection logic, prioritization models, and operational workflows
04
Fractional Security Operations Leadership
[Retainer]
-
Ongoing oversight, strategy, and operational alignment without building oversized teams
What You Get
Clear ownership and playbooks for real incidents, a lean operating model, and detection that prioritizes business risk over alert volume